Saturday, February 24, 2024

Movie Review: "The Pod Generation" 01/19/23

This is a movie review for "The Pod Generation", released January 19, 2023 at the Sundance Festival in the USA. I watched this February 24, 2024 via Hulu.



Trailer






Genre
Comedy, Romance, Sci-Fi



Cast
Emilia Clarke - Rachel Novy
Chiwetel Ejiofor - Alvy Novy
Rosalie Craig - Womb Center Director



Plot

Women nowadays are becoming more career-focused and ambitious. Even though they want children, they don't want to have to deal with the "side effects" of pregnancy like nausea, stretch marks, weight they cannot drop, etc.

In the near future, there is a solution to this need: The Womb Center. Have your baby and keep your body too! The Pegazus company has created a system that allows children to be grown within an artificial womb [a pod / "egg"].

Rachel, a worker for Pegazus, has been offered (as part of a promotion) help with the down payment for a child grown through the Womb Center. She is the main income for her and her husband, but that isn't the biggest barrier. Her husband is in a rare vocation in the day of 3D printed food, paying to being able to breathe pure air from a plant, and having AI everywhere helping with calendars/clothing/work. Alvy is a biologist and doesn't like the idea of an "egg baby". Why not stick to something more natural, like a real pregnancy?

Are they able to have a baby? Will they go with the Womb Center? How will this affect their relationship? Will they be able to bond with the baby in a pod?




Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



4/5 - *SPOILERS*
I watched this because I saw it pop up on my Hulu. I brought it to the attention of a coworker/friend of mine and we had a discussion, considering I just posted the review about "Splice" this week and he had things to say about it. I said that Splice brought up the question about whether or not artificial wombs would be a thing in the future, not just for experimentations or for animals but for humans. Then I saw this on Hulu and I told him about it. We chatted a bit about this, whether it would be ethical or just to do this. I brought up the question about the connection between mother and child, considering the mother's immune system gives the child a protective shield for a little while after birth. This movie slightly touched on the connection issue but they never got into the medical side of things, which is one of the reasons why I knocked down the rating from 5 stars.

The first annoyance was the fact that it took over 2 minutes to get to the opening of the movie due to all of the brand names and company names that they were showing. The ending also ended over 7 minutes to the end of the film, according to Hulu. So that means that over 9 minutes were dedicated to credits etcetera. Annoying. Not a star reducer but definitely annoying.

Anyways, this was a good movie. For the first third of the movie, I was smacking my head going "wtf is this woman doing!" because she decided to sign up for a position at the Womb Center, visits them, and drops a $8,700 deposit on this Womb Center thing without consulting her husband. When she tells him, she nearly bulldozes him on the decision by showing off a friend of hers that has a pod. The friend is all like "this is the best decision ever. Society expects women to be all that but then, when she wants to make a stand and say that she doesn't want to deal with pregnancy yet have kids, she's considered a bitch". Super mega feminist vibes, let me tell you! Let's have a choice about whether or not we want pregnancy to mess up what we have. [Sounds familiar?]

So Alvy finally agrees to go with the decision to have the pod baby. Rachel is surprised but enthusiastic. They go to the Womb Center, sign the contract, and have an egg of Rachel's fertilized by Alvy's sperm. Voila, life! But it isn't very large, because zygotes are small.

Rachel starts pulling away from Alvy and her personality starts changing towards depression or some sort of "blah". Alvy, however, is slowly starting to become more accustomed to the idea of the baby inside the pod being able to hear/experience while in the pod. Mostly stay-at-home dad starts bonding with the baby, whereas working mom starts seeing declines in her work production levels. She gets frustrated and tries to take the pod to work, but a coworker says something to the effect of "you need to put your pod in a closet while you're at work or else you'll be seen as the 'distracted mom'".

Meanwhile, we are viewing a constant conversation in the movie about AI and virtual assistants (like Siri, but worse). The constant bombardment of technology clashes severely with Alvy's career of choice. He even, at one point, is told at the college campus that his greenhouse is costing the college too much so why don't we phase out the plants and put in holograms?

Between all of the little drops of hints and worries that Rachel feels, we start wondering if the technological approach to having a baby is even right. She sees a woman pregnant and she starts wanting to have that over having her baby in a pod. She feels that she can't connect with it and is very frustrated because she is the mother whereas Alvy is calling it baby instead of pod/egg. It is a strong shift from what the movie started off at and it is very interesting.

Rachel finally takes a turn towards wanting something more natural for the baby. She decides to go rogue, with Alvy agreeing but still wanting things to go right for the child. Rachel convinces him that they need to take the baby to their island house [that her dad had said "why don't you sell it since you have a child on the way" and Alvy had said, "I want our child to know nature".]. Alvy goes over to the Womb Center to prove that they want a 'home birth' and the Womb Center director says that it is not permitted because they need to make sure that the pod is safe [per the contract]. Alvy and Rachel take the pod, and an olive tree that he had given to the baby when it came home the first time, and head out to the island home. She reconnects with what he was saying about nature and survival and finally seems to come to herself. This is a huge thing because that says that technology isn't always the best thing for us and that we may need to be a bit more natural just for our own preservation.

Anyways, they finally get the sound from the pod that the baby is ready to come out but the Womb Center won't give up the birth code to open it up, so Alvy just takes a screwdriver and gently pries it open to take the child out. After a tense moment, they pull the child out and it cries. They are happy and have their child, thank goodness.

Rachel returns the pod via the mail to the Womb Center, returns to her little family and cuddles with her baby, content, and the movie ends. We are not told about if it is a boy or a girl, which I was curious about since the Womb Center director was shocked to hear that they didn't want to choose the gender of the child before conception. We are not told about the repercussions about the fact that they pried open the pod, nor if she lost her job because of this whole situation. I would have loved an epilogue but they just leave us flat with the fact that "yes, they had their kid, isn't that nice".



Personally, I felt like there would have been more dirt on the Womb Center. Like they insisted that the pod be at the Womb Center for a lot of the time. Are they programming the children or tampering with them while no one is there to take care of them? What kind of special procedures are they doing to deliver the children out of the pod? What other nefarious schemes are they working on?
They also promoted "indirect parenting", so parents don't need to connect with the pod/child. Pegazus also promoted children at school to have "art time" where the computers were doing the art and the children were only giving feedback. How is this childhood?! Yes, it is a statement about how technology might hurt our children/future, but how many people would go along with this without batting an eyelash?
I think that, in general, the villain was Pegazus and the Womb Center, but it could be said that they were just trying to help and improve the world. [The path to Hell is paved with good intentions?] We also see, within the ending credits, the CEO of Pegazus saying that they hope, in the future, that children can choose their own parents. Ummmm, really? I don't know what to say aside I did not like Pegazus, especially with the fact that they pushed Rachel to think about having a child but then made her put the pod in the closet!



I'm going to end this ranting because that is more than enough typing for me, lol. That's my movie review! Thanks for reading. I'd love comments. More reviews to come eventually.



Friday, February 23, 2024

Movie Review: "Suddenly" 09/17/54

This is a movie review for "Suddenly", released on September 17, 1954 in the United States and in London, England (UK). We watched this November 14, 2020.




Trailer







Cast
Frank Sinatra - John Baron
Sterling Hayden - Sheriff Tod Shaw
James Gleason - Pop Benson
Nancy Gates - Ellen Benson
Kim Charney - Peter Benson III "Pidge"




Plot

When the President of the United States comes to town, the area must be secured for the safety of the President. In the quiet town of Suddenly, the President is due to get off of his train and make an appearance. One of the unsuspecting families finds a few people appearing to FBI come over to their house, as it is the most likely location of a sniper shooting the President as he gets off of the train - on a hill with a clear view. When it is revealed that they are not FBI but are in fact there to assassinate the President, the family (widow, her father, and her son) have to figure out what to do. The widow is anti-violence and does not like that the Sheriff of town [Sheriff Tod Shaw, who is also trying to court her] gave her son a toy gun previously. How is she going to react to having blood-thirsty assassins in her house trying to kill the President of the United States? Can they survive this ordeal? Will they save the President, and how?





Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



4/5 - *SPOILERS*

I completely forgot that I watched this movie until it came up on the list. I had to do some digging, reading, and watching of the last 10 minutes of the film to remember about it.

First off, it is interesting to find Frank Sinatra as an actor. I am not familiar with him being an actor so this was a new world for me.

Anyways, this was a good movie. It isn't boring though it came out in 1954. Of course, it was slow in our modern standards but it was easy on the eyes.

The question about whether violence is always bad is brought up. The anti-violence widow has to come to terms that she is one of the very last person that can stop the assassins from killing the President. She has also seen the main assassin (Baron, played by Sinatra) shoot the guy that was fixing the TV as well as shooting the Sheriff. What would stop him from shooting herself, her father or her son? So she has to take up the gun [literally and figuratively] to protect her household too.

I wasn't around during the time of this release, obviously, but I think it is a good movie for what it is. There maybe could have been more "character development" but it keeps the focus on what is happening in the moment, instead of deviating to back story shots etcetera. In that kind of scenario, focusing on the situation is good to make the tension felt.

Could it have used more to make it more realistic/relatable? Yes. Don't go sending a guy out of the house when you have it under control, especially as the bad guy. Also, why didn't the folks nearby respond to the sounds of gunfire in the house? For a small town, you'd think they would respond more....


You're going to ask so I will put the spoiler out there: the assassins were averted (killed), the widow shot Baron to stop him from shooting from the window at the President, the Sheriff was injured but took up the gun after the widow and shot the last shot killing Baron, the family survived, and the widow and the Sheriff seemed to be starting to head for a date the next day.

I know this is short but that's the mystique of this movie review.


Is it for everyone? No, especially if you don't like old-old movies or have an issue with violence or need modern CGI effects / action.

Recommended? Sure. Go check it out on YouTube.







That's my movie review! Thank you for reading. More to come eventually.

Thursday, February 22, 2024

Movie Review: "Splice" 10/06/09 SPAIN

This is a movie review for "Splice", released October 06, 2009 in Spain at the Sitges International Festival of Fantastic and Horror Cinema. I watched this with a friend on October 27, 2020.



Trailer







Genre
Horror, Sci-Fi


Cast
Adrien Brody - Clive Nicoli
Sarah Polley - Elsa Kast
Delphine Chaneac - Dren
David Hewlett - William Barlow
Abigail Chu - Child Dren



Plot

Genetic engineering is always looking at what can be done. Two genetic scientists are looking to make creatures that have never existed before but, after one experiment catastrophically failed in front of a live audience, their funding was cut. They continued onwards with their experiments, secretly, splicing human DNA in with one of the experiments. Right when they thought it would be a waste, a creature survived. How is the human DNA going to affect the creature? Will it be intelligent? Can it understand things or thoughts or feelings? How is it going to grow? How human will it be? Where is the boundary to what it is and what it can do?







Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.




2/5 - *SPOILERS*

I thought this would be an interesting movie, hence choosing to watch this. The science behind creating these creatures was definitely intriguing but the ethical questioning (about whether or not we should do this) was barely touched. True, this is just a movie but movies have to ask hard questions that are sometimes near impossible to bring up in the real life: What is possible? How far can we go? Where is the boundary? How much of playing "like God" is allowable? What are the consequences?


The movie went away from these questions and decided to go another route. Sex sells so let's make the creature (named Dren) sexual. We don't know how DNA can change anatomy (like "Jurassic Park"'s dinosaurs changing genders due to frog DNA because of the need to procreate), but this movie decided to watch the creature growing up and becoming sexual.

The creatures that caused scientists Elsa and Clive to lose their funding had originally been one female and one male. One of the creatures had lost estrogen and had changed genders, but no one noticed until the two were literally fighting each other with their fangs to kill each other in a bloody disaster. Despite this, Elsa and Clive continued with their experiments, added human DNA, and *DIDN'T* watch out for indications of the gender change issue happening again! I am frustrated at this. Scientists should be watching out for flaws they had seen in previous test subjects / experiments, but these guys were just all gung ho for the newest experiment that they forgot to watch out for this. So of course, Dren grows up as a female creature and starts taking a sexual interest in Clive. That, combined with the fact that Elsa was just so obsessed with learning about and raising Dren that she didn't pay attention to her boyfriend/partner Clive, made Clive more inclined to get freaky with the alien-human hybrid. There is talk that they may have used Elsa's DNA for the splicing so that might be another reason why he was okay to get some freak on, but wtf.

But it doesn't stop there!!
Dren changed genders, becoming more male, then wanted to take Elsa. As if one human partner wasn't enough! So male Dren kills Clive, Clive's brother, and their boss. This is probably because of two reasons: to be able to copulate with Elsa, the other males needed to be taken out of the picture, and for self-preservation.
Anyways, as male Dren gets to copulate with Elsa, Clive tries to save her, gets killed by Dren, and then Elsa kills Dren. We then, at the very end, see Elsa pregnant (supposedly with Dren's child?). How is that supposed to make one feel? Is this right, to continue a hybrid's bloodline? Would it be better to kill it off, ethically? Or would the "sacrifice" of all the deaths be "wasted" if you aborted that creature-child?



This is something to think on:




I agree with what this Director has to say about movie bringing things to light to question, but does that make this a good film? Maybe, maybe not. That is speculative.




Is this a movie for everyone? No. Is it watchable? Yes. Should you watch it? That's up to you. I do not regret watching this though it won't be high on the re-watch list. I am glad that I got another view into this topic but there's much more to watch other than this.





That's my movie review. Thank you for reading! More reviews will come eventually.



Show Review: "Good Omens 2" 2019-2023, Amazon Prime

This is a show review for "Good Omens 2" (second season of "Good Omens" 2019), released 2023. I watched this on Amazon Prime in February 2024.



Trailer








Cast

David Tennant - Crowley
Michael Sheen - Aziraphale
Miranda Richardson - Shax 
Jon Hamm - Gabriel / Archangel Gabriel
Shelley Conn - Beelzebub



Plot

Crowley and Aziraphale have tried settling into life after saving the world from the Apocalypse and everything seemed normal until a naked man shows up at the door to Aziraphale's book shop. It is none other than the Archangel Gabriel without his memory. What happened? What's heading our way? Can we solve the mystery of Gabriel's memory being lost before the world (or at least the bookshop) is destroyed?


Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the show.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful show all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.


3/5 - *SPOILERS!*

I was so excited to see the second season but it was disappointing. Seriously, wtf was this about! Let me just smack my head against a wall......

Long story short, Gabriel fell in love (is that what it was?) with Beelzebub because they got to know each other after the avoided Apocalypse. Gabriel ended up not approving of a reset of the Apocalypse, so he was demoted from the supreme Archangel status.


Okay, so Archangel Gabriel is demoted. So what? Well, he manages to seal away his memory before Heaven wipes his memory from him. So a brain-wiped ex-Archangel is walking around naked on Earth, in London, to angel Aziraphale's bookshop..... Seriously. And Heaven and Hell are both on a rampage trying to find / find out what happened to Gabriel, so Crowley and Aziraphale do a combination miracle to hide him from both sides. A "small" miracle which turns out to be a major beacon to Heaven that says that there was a massive energy miracle performed at Aziraphale's shop. Aziraphale, upon being questioned by some other angels, plays it off as him trying to make two local shop keepers fall in love (since the record selling gal has a thing for the coffee shop gal). [I'm not even joking..... This is how it went.]

So the episodes have Aziraphale running around trying to solve Gabriel's memory mystery, Aziraphale and Crowley trying to help the record lady and the coffee shop lady fall in love, and then we have to talk about the bromance between Crowley and Aziraphale. Once it is revealed that Gabriel hid his own memory and that he fell for Beelzebub, and the romance between the record lady and coffee shop lady has started off, the attention is turned to the relationship between Crowley and Aziraphale.

I admit, I thought that the bromance between the two (especially in the first season) was freaking adorable but to make it more into a romance thing.... -sigh- Well, anyways, Aziraphale is offered the supreme Archangel position in Heaven right before Crowley confronts him saying "if they can get away from all of this madness, why can't we?". Aziraphale is like "come to Heaven, be reinstated, and be my right-hand angel so we can work together" whereas Crowley kiss him ("there could have been an "us" ").

End of episode really just cuts off there, leaving an awkward and painful gap between the two as Crowley drives off (hurt) and Aziraphale takes an elevator to Heaven, being told about "we call it the Second Coming".



-sigh- I liked season one a lot and was soooo excited to see season two being announced but I was disappointed by this season and how everything went. I loved the bromance between Crowley and Aziraphale but trying to push the homosexual theme [between the record lady and the coffee shop lady, and between Crowley and Aziraphale] was tough to take. Live and let live, in my opinion, but this was way more than that. Like, why couldn't they promote love without promoting homosexuality? I mean, like "Frozen" was supposed to show that true love can be for one sibling to another without being about sex and incest and whatnot, this could have been really good. Why did they have to take it to the next level? Sure, the two shop keepers could have their thing but why did they have to make Crowley and Aziraphale go to the next level? Maybe that's why Aziraphale was like "ummm... we work together?". I don't know. The ending left a bitter taste in my mouth, metaphorically speaking, especially after the wait for the release of the second season.


Am I put off for watching the third season if they ever make it? No. I am interested and I hope that they redeem the series/characters.


Anyways, that's my show review/rant. Thanks for reading! Feel free to leave a comment.

More reviews to come eventually.




Wednesday, February 21, 2024

Show Review: "Hazbin Hotel" 2019-2024, Amazon Prime

This is a show review for "Hazbin Hotel", released on Amazon Prime 2024. The original Pilot episode was released in 2019. I watched this season on Amazon Prime in February 2024.


WARNING: NOT for everyone!


Trailer







Cast
Erika Henningsen - Charlie Morningstar
Stephanie Beatriz - Vaggie
Blake Roman - Angel Dust
Alex Brightman - Sir Pentious
Keith David - Husk
Kimiko Glenn - Niffty
Amir Talai - Alastor


Plot

Hell isn't the most fun place to be, considering Heaven sends angels down to kill the demons/lost souls to make sure that they will not become overpopulated in Hell. Charlie Morningstar, daughter of Lucifer Morningstar (fallen angel and ruler of Hell) and Lilith (wife to Lucifer), wants to find a way to look at the world with positivity and hope. Is there a way to redeem the demons and lost souls of hell? Charlie hopes so and wishes to aid them in their quest to redemption through her hotel "Hazbin Hotel". With the assistance of her girlfriend/bodyguard Vaggie, the radio demon Alastor, the cleaner Niffy, the drunkard bar tender Husk, Charlie hopes to save her people. Of course, it doesn't come that easily since this is residents of Hell we're talking about.




Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the show.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful show all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



4/5 - *SPOILERS*

I thought this show was very cute but very naive, for the being the princess of Hell. I mean, do you see what everyone's doing?! You are exposed to watching BDSM, cannibalism, senseless shootings and killings and violence, etc. And you think that you can save these people? *facepalm*  I like that she is so optimistic but it just seems like a pointless endeavor.

I did find it interesting that she exposed (in Heaven) that they were doing the exterminations and that folks in Heaven were appalled by it, but they still didn't approve of Charlie's redemption plan.

The reveal that Vaggie is actually an ex-exterminator angel was a little baffling but at the same time wasn't too earth-shattering.
I liked how they stood up against Heaven for their own survival and bonded together.


The ending of the season was good but also lackluster. I would be interested in watching the next season whenever it comes out but hopefully we don't have to wait for 5 years for it to come out.


The thing I liked the most about this show was Alastor, honestly - doing everything for his own entertainment. :-) There were some good songs, but Alastor glowed brightest in this season with "Stayed Gone". Husk and Angel Dust also were amazing in "Loser, Baby".



Is this for everyone? NO!!! Keep sensitive people (and younger children) away from this! I warned you.




Anyways, that's my review. I look forward to the second season, but will miss Sir Pentious as a resident of Hell. [I totally want to see what happens to him being in Heaven.]



Thank you for reading! More reviews to come eventually!