Saturday, March 16, 2024

Movie Review: "Moonfall" 02/02/22

This is a movie review for "Moonfall", released February 2, 2022. I saw a clip of this on the TV (a Sci-Fi channel) on March 14, 2024, which grabbed my attention so I decided to watch this. I finish watching this March 16, 2024.

I find it hilarious that this movie was released 02-02-22. Is this trying to make a statement about life by releasing it on such a symmetrical numbered day? Probably just coincidence.




My Storytime Brief Video on This Movie






Trailer





Genre
Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi



Notable Cast
Halle Berry ... Jocinda Fowler
Patrick Wilson ... Brian Harper
John Bradley ... KC Houseman
Charlie Plummer ... Sonny Harper





Plot

Earth's Moon has had an incident where it is falling out of orbit. How can we stop it / fix the problem?Let's send acting NASA director Jocinda Fowler (Halle Berry), expert astronaut Brian Harper (Patrick Wilson), and genius nerd KC Houseman (John Bradley) in an attempt to save the Earth. It turns out that the Moon is a megastructure built by our far-past ancestors to help create/sustain an environment for raising organic life [humanity] and that the ancestors had a war with their AI which wants to take out all organic life. Their war has come to our planet and their AI wants to take out "two birds with one stone": take out the Moon which will take out the Earth and the chance for any other earth to be created.
Can Jo, Brian, and KC save the Moon and the Earth? Can their families survive the disaster from this whole thing?





Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



4/5 - *SPOILERS*

I must give credit to the idea of this movie - the Moon is a MEGA STRUCTURE!! With a white dwarf in the middle of it! And a gyroscopic ring system to keep it in orbit and to help create/sustain the earth for human life. Absolutely awesome.
Oh, and the creators of this megastructure? Our ancestors from long long ago (in a galaxy far far away.....). But why is their mega scientific creation here and not them? Well, because AI rose up [surprise?] and decided to take out organic life or at least humans. They don't say whether the AI goes after animals too but they definitely say that the swarm of technology is going after organic life with electronic technology near them, aka "humans".
I have to argue that all creatures have some sort of electrical current/influence in their biology so maybe they mean organic with the intelligence to have created electronic technology? That would make more sense because, as far as we know, humans are the only ones to make tools with electrical workings.

Anyways, there were definitely some potholes in this movie plot. First off, I get that Brian's son Sonny was disappointed that no one would stand by him (Brian) after he testified about the swarm back 10-12 years ago attacking a space mission that he, Jo, and a third astronaut had been on and that had resulted in the loss of the third astronaut. However, that doesn't mean that Sonny just automatically would go for the bad-boy image lashing out, stealing cars, etc. I don't understand why they made him like that.  Then the movie tries to talk about his relation with his stepfather and the fact that he had never gone up to his mom's/stepdad's Aspen retreat (at a guard gate, he says to a shooter, "I'm Brenda's son." She shoots at him saying "I've never seen him before."), which was awkwardly set up. Sonny eventually tells his stepdad that he doesn't hate him, which is good because his stepdad does a self-sacrifice for one of his daughters (gives his oxygen tank to his daughter so she can breathe and continue walking to safety). At least his stepdad tried to be a good person and had the closure that his stepson didn't hate him.
Sonny, however, was still a bit of a mess with the information around him. We see him trying to be good and taking care of Jo's son and her foreign exchange student, in the way a friend's family looks out for another friend's family. Yet Sonny is still a weird hodgepodge of everything. The biggest pro going for him in this movie is the fact that his dad is the main character. If Brian wasn't his father, there would be almost no point to this character. Because of Sonny, Brian is still wanting to protect the world. True, Brian has been acting as a fallen-from-grace character since he was silenced about the AI swarm back at the last space mission. He's been running from landlords and hiding away. He's bitter but not completely without merit. Was he around much for his son? I don't know, though some would say that the grand theft auto stunt by his son would be an indication that maybe Brian wasn't there, though he would do anything for his son.

Secondly, it almost seemed like the creator of this storyline was using the fact that the Moon's megastructure had its own gravity to influence action scenes. Obviously, you're going to have to deal with gravity changes when you have two bodies so close to each other, but the rules of the gravity didn't seem consistent.
There's a Three-Stooges group of bad guys that come after Sonny, his stepdad and his mom, his half sisters, the foreign exchange girl, and Jo's son. I say Three Stooges because there are three, they are dumb, and their persistence on being a nuisance is ridiculous. These three steal Jo's son's backpack and the vehicle that Sonny had driven away from the rocket launch site and you'd think that was the last of them. They came back a second time to take the oxygen tanks from them (in a building) and Sonny reverses the theft, getting out of there. They come back for the third time, all three of them getting into vehicles to chase after our group because of the oxygen tanks. Spoilers but none of the Three Stooges survive and our group gets away from them safe.

In "Armageddon" (released 1998), they had the jump over the "Grand Canyon of this asteroid" but they had to use thrusters to land on the other side instead of floating up into space.
In this movie, however, they sped up the car to get across a drop. They fly upwards, bouncing off of a floating 'island' of ground that was being drawn upwards, then somehow find themselves on the other side of this drop with all the wheels down on the ground safe and sound. I guess you could say "well, the moon isn't directly above so the influence on the area is reduced which is why they didn't get grabbed by the moon's gravity field and that's how they landed", but that still doesn't make full sense to me. If we just had parked cars being moved by the moon, why wouldn't that influence the car they were in? Oh, maybe because they were in motion? Maybe the gravity of the moon was enough to make a jumping semi truck's jump further, over our group's car and into one of the bad guys, but not enough to grab on to a car that is skidding on snow and ice? Right, because snow and ice totally gives great traction.... [Being very sarcastic.]
The death of the first Three Stooge was great because it reminded me of "Twister" (released 1996) with the twister throwing big things, especially Jonas' death. Sorry, Jonas, but you were an idiot that should have listened and therefore died. This stooge died similarly, which was somehow satisfying.



Anyways, there are a few nods in the movie to other sci-fi movies.
- stepdad Tom switches his vehicle from Eco to Sport mode as Sonny is driving and says "Switch to warp mode"(Star Trek).
- KC at one point comments on the fact that their shuttle has gotten a speed update by saying "Ludicrous speed" (Spaceballs).




....I have more to say but cannot find the words to say, so I will be stopping this movie review here. If i remember what I wanted to say, I'll add it later.



Thank you for reading! More reviews to come eventually.



Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Movie Review: "Damsel" 03/08/24

This is a movie review for "Damsel", released online on March 8, 2024. I watched this via Netflix on March 12, 2024. I think this is the soonest I have watched a movie after a release!



Trailer





Genre
Action, Adventure, Fantasy


Notable Cast

Millie Bobby Brown ... Elodie
Ray Winstone ... Lord Bayford
Angela Bassett ... Lady Bayford
Brooke Carter ... Floria
Nick Robinson ... Prince Henry
Robin Wright ... Queen Isabelle
Shohreh Aghdashloo ... Dragon (voice)




Plot

When an arranged marriage option comes up to save their people, Lord Bayford agrees to let his eldest daughter Elodie marry Prince Henry. The family she is marrying into is wealthy and mysterious. The prince is handsome. What could go wrong?
Well, how about the prince voluntarily throwing her in to a cave to be a sacrifice for a dragon? Damsel in distress situation with no one coming to rescue her... Can Elodie make it out? Can she survive? Can she uncover the truth behind the royal family's mysterious history?




Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.


4.5/5 - *SPOILERS* I know some have already said that this movie took a while to get to the point of the sacrifice and that it was already spoiled in the trailer but sometimes a slow start can be good. I enjoyed it. I liked watching the way that the Bayford family was enticed into the arrangement, but I did wonder what her father learned with the "we must talk about details" and he came storming out of a private meeting. Like, did he learn that she was going to be sacrificed? Or was it a "you will never see your daughter again and we don't want you here because you are a lower class of humans than we are", like Queen Isabelle was trying to tell stepmother Bayford? I have to knock it down a half star for that because he didn't feel right about this whole situation (how much did he know beforehand!?) but still let it pass. Her father, stepmother and sister see her marry Prince Henry in a reserved small ceremony and the newlywed couple is swept away in a fancy carriage up to the mountain. We're going to go "pay homage to my ancestors", which of course means 'let's get our scent and our blood on you so that the dragon doesn't know better, then toss you off into the cave to be a sacrifice'. This deserves all of the face-palm feels.

The way that Elodie comforted a burning bird in the cave, and apologized with the glow-worms when she realized they could heal, and the way that she dealt the final dealings with the dragon just made me so proud of Elodie. Like yes, this is how a good person should be! Even after all of the pain, struggling, and suffering, you can still have kindness, sympathy, and understanding. Stand up for what is right (showing the dragon that it was fooled and who did the fooling), not what seems right (taking the dragon down for causing pain on yourself).

In the end, her father tried to help her/ save her because she was worth more to him than the gold the royal family had paid him as "bride price", the royal family got what they deserved, Elodie acknowledged that her stepmother tried to warn her [called her "Mother" instead of "Stepmother"], and the hero rode off into the sunset with plans for the future.

Is this for everyone? No - fantasy violence, people/creatures burning alive painfully, sword-play, human sacrifice, lack of care for others' lives, etc.
For those that aren't put off by these things, I would recommend this movie if you like strong female characters and a twist on the typical "dragon with a damsel" theme.

I loved it! Would I watch it again? Yes. Have I already raved about it to a friend? Yes.

And I did a thing, for good or for bad.:






Anyways, that's my movie review. Thank you for reading! More movie reviews to come eventually.
Also, let me know what you thought about my "Story-Time" vid. Might have an OC of mine do more of these in the future.



Saturday, March 9, 2024

Movie Review: "The Addams Family" - 10/11/19

This is a movie review for "The Addams Family", released October 11, 2019. I watched this November 17, 2020 via Hulu. I was excited to watch this because I love the old school Addams Family show and the 1990s movies, so I had to watch this.





Trailer







Genre
Animation, Comedy, Family



Notable Cast

Oscar Isaac ... Gomez Addams (voice)
Charlize Theron ... Morticia Addams (voice)
Chloƫ Grace Moretz ... Wednesday Addams (voice)
Finn Wolfhard ... Pugsley Addams (voice)
Nick Kroll ... Uncle Fester (voice)
Snoop Dogg ... It (voice)
Bette Midler ... Grandma (voice)
Allison Janney ... Margaux Needler (voice)
Conrad Vernon ... Lurch / Priest / Spirit of the House / Dr. Flambe (voice)




Plot

Morticia and Gomez Addams have just recently been married but they don't want to have to deal with being ostracized in the old country, so they move to the United States. New Jersey, of all places. They set up in an old abandoned asylum and start building their family. Thirteen years later, the local town decides to drain a swamp which reveals the Addams house. Morticia, Gomez and their children Wednesday and Pugsley now have to figure out how to deal with the locals. Will it be another case of being run out of the area? Can Wednesday and Pugsley fit in with the other children?





Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



2.5/5  - *SPOILERS*
Not for those that know the old show: Pugsley's character was too upbeat, Lurch's appearance and voice was not right, IT had arms and was too short, and Gomez's face looked like he was a potato.

"I wish something would liven up this already tedious day" says Wednesday - that was not how she was supposed to be!! Wednesday of the old black-and-white show was a vibrant, energetic yet gothic girl. This Wednesday is just a questioning preteen that is going against what her parents had set up for her - going to public school, making friends, hanging out with other girls her age, wearing a pink unicorn hairpiece.
Most of the movie revolves around Wednesday and her new friend - how can these two girls from two different walks of life become friends and prove to both Wednesday's parents and Parker's mom that this is okay? Definitely something aimed towards kids/preteens, and not just for "introducing the next generation to the Addams Family" due to the storyline. What the movie tries to push is the idea of "be yourself, not the same as everyone else". Aside that, there was not much plotline at all.

I thought this movie was atrocious. I was so excited to watch this but, during and afterwards, felt disappointed. True that I was able to get through the movie but I partially wished I hadn't. I'd rather stick to the old movies and the old black-and-white show, thanks.

....and there's a movie sequel out now? *smh* I guess it was popular enough to merit a try at creating a sequel, but I am not currently interested enough to watch it.


Is this family friendly? Yes. Should you watch it? That's your call. Would those that love the older stuff like this? That's a hit or miss, honestly. Would I rewatch? I personally would not want to!!




That's my movie review. Thank you for reading! More reviews to come eventually.


Movie Review: "Clemency" 01/27/19

This is a movie review for "Clemency", first released January 27, 2019 at the Sundance Festival. We watched this on November 17, 2020 via Hulu.


*WARNING* - This is not a movie for everyone due to the nature of the topic: death row inmates receiving the death penalty.



Trailer








Genre
Drama



Notable Cast

Alfre Woodard - Bernadine Williams
Aldis Hodge - Anthony Woods
Richard Schiff - Marty Lumetta
Wendell Pierce - Jonathan Williams



Plot


Some jobs are tough but none tougher than being a prison warden that executes death row inmates by order of the state. That is Bernadine Williams' job and it isn't easy - protestors, nasty letters, etc. just make it that much more difficult. On top of that is the question about what this work does to the warden's emotional state (or soul). As Bernadine detaches from things around her, the question becomes whether she can continue to do her job and still give the inmates respect.




Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.




3.5/5 - Honestly, I had a hard time remembering about this movie so I had to go back and read others' reviews on IMDB. Even so, this wasn't a very rememberable movie. I had rated it 3.5/5 with the only notes saying "Terrible ending that doesn't give us any closure to what happens to Bernadine". Someone had said that you could see her emotional/mental state slipping especially at the end of the movie, but I do not recall that.

Would I rewatch this movie? Maybe, but it isn't high on the list of priorities. Do I recommend it? Not for everyone. It was decent enough to watch to get an insight on what life is like for the warden executing inmates (and the horrors that haunt them afterwards). It also proves the point that J.K. Rowling said in her Harry Potter series - murder tears the soul apart. You can see that it affects Warden Williams throughout her whole life [it is hard to kill someone and then go have a joyful tea party a few hours later]. It makes one think about whether or not death row inmates should actually be executed. True, there are a few cases where their crimes are heinous/atrocious crimes against humanity, but does it mean that we should take *their* lives for what they have done? And what happens if/when the person that is accused is innocent?


On a side note, I heard recently (2024) that some people are saying prisoners sentenced to life without parole cost the state {I don't know which state(s)} too much money and should be executed. Excuse me?! Seriously, what are you thinking? There are still innocent people that are sentenced for things they have not done. And now you're saying that the state/government doesn't want to pay the taxes to keep those inmates alive, so we might as well just off them? What is the world coming to?!
Don't tell me that we've made our justice system better and more efficient, being able to precisely prove who is guilty and who is innocent. It may be better than back in the 1990s, but we are still not all-mighty and all-knowing. There are still cases of innocent people being thrown into jail. There are still people being accused of things without evidence. But you want to go and execute them because we can't afford to keep them alive?! WTF.
This burns me up so I'm going to end the review without going deeper into this argument.



Thank you for reading. More reviews to come eventually!


 

Movie Review: "London Has Fallen" 02/25/16 UAE

This is a movie review for "London Has Fallen", first released in the United Arab Emirates on February 25, 2016.


I was going to do the review for "Angel Has Fallen" (viewed back in 2020) but then realized that there was actually a 2nd movie between "Olympus Has Fallen" and "Angel Has Fallen". I then decided that I would watch this before doing the movie review for the third movie of the series. I rewatched "Olympus Has Fallen" on March 7, 2024 (with a friend), and we watched "London Has Fallen" on March 8, 2024, so here's the movie review!





Trailer





Genre
Action, Thriller

Notable Cast


Alon Aboutboul ... Aamir Barkawi (as Alon Moni Aboutboul)
Waleed Zuaiter ... Kamran Barkawi
Gerard Butler ... Mike Banning
Aaron Eckhart ... Benjamin Asher
Radha Mitchell ... Leah Banning
Morgan Freeman ... VP Allan Trumbull
Charlotte Riley ... MI6 Jacquelin Marshall
Bryan Larkin ... SAS Lieutenant




Plot

It has been years since the attack on the White House. The Prime Minister of the UK has passed away, within 24 hours since a major surgery. Leaders of the world have been called upon to come to his funeral, including USA President Asher (much to Secret Services agent Mike Banning's chagrin, especially with his first baby due shortly). President Asher says that he should go since England/UK has been one of their biggest allies over the years, so the Secret Services come up with a plan to get him there and back safely. This is the most "protected" event of the world: what could go wrong? 






Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.

1/5 – Barely worth any time.

2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.

3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.

4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.

5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.


5/5 - *SPOILERS*
Honestly, this was just a great movie all around. The action, the music, the character development, etc - all superb. It was great to see Mike Banning (played by Gerard Butler) back in action again. He tells the President, at one point, that he hates funerals. Considering all that they had to go through because of a world leader's funeral, I don't blame him!

Banning goes above and beyond to protect and rescue the President, seeing through the fact that there is a mole in the MI6, using a drone (that is "always above the President") to relay messages to the USA when communications go down, and going almost kamikaze against multiple attackers to get to the President with minutes ticking down to his execution. The funniest thing is that the man made of "bourbon and bad choices" is the best choice to get the job done. Even when the MI6 [England/UK's version similar to the USA's CIA) say "hold on, we'll get the job done", Mike says no, it needs to be done now, no matter what. He's right - if he hadn't gone in right there and gotten the job done right, the President would have been executed on live stream on the Internet [we see screens in NYC, London, etc with his video showing]. When the President's time is almost up, he hears the captors say something about their power system and he knows that Mike is coming. {It is rather cute to see his reaction, knowing that Mike is on the way. Could be seen as a bromance, if you will. It isn't just the President and the bodyguard - it is friendship. It is also very tastefully done so I do not oppose it.} Mike shows up just in time, kicks a**, recovers the President, finds evidence to connect a bad guy (#6 on the top 10 most wanted list) to this situation, explodes the building, and still gets to walk out of there alive. Two weeks later, we see him cooing over his new baby [named after the late Lynne Jacobs, his old boss that was supposed to be the godmother but had been killed when their helicopter went down in the UK]. He debates on putting in his resignation but changes his mind when he hears Vice President Trumbull say that we need to continue on to protect our children. Of course, being the brand new daddy, Mike deletes his resignation letter and continues being in the Secret Services.


Oh, and to top it off, we find out that yes, the Prime Minister of UK was assassinated, so this whole thing was a trap to start off with to throw the world into chaos. Why they didn't wait to investigate after his death? I'm not sure but it definitely helped move the movie along - "short timing, let's get together to honor him!"

The mole in the MI6? Well, he did it because their security protocols were flawed and the world is in trouble, and lots of money. Was he justified in doing so? No, but it just goes to prove that criminal actions can be made by everyone, especially with the means and motivation to do so.



Anyways, that's my movie review! Thank you for reading. Do comment below.
More to come in the future (especially "Angel Has Fallen").