Friday, February 22, 2019

Struggle With Reality

On February 18, 2019, I decided to become a different person and to leave the past hurt and abuse behind me. My mother called me on the 19th and I updated her on my knee recovery and on what is happening with our housing situation. I even told her that she should be happy if we can be financially stable, even if I am not around. She ignored that saying that she was happy to have me more stable but crying because she was worried about her dog. Lucy, adopted 2 months prior to the conversation, was adopted from a shelter and had been abused previously. The dog has had a history of biting at people and my mother wanted to focus on that over us, even though I was asking for support. I told her that I would look into how to help the dog stop biting and call her back, for which she seemed grateful.

On the 20th, I called her and gave her my results of the research: patience, love and communication, and space is needed for an abused animal. She seemed to feel hurt to hear this but I told her that there are only 4 ways to deal with a biting dog: be patient and communicate, put the dog in an area which will not let it bite, give it to a different home, or put it down. Oh, the waterworks. She then said something to the effect of "I don't know anymore". What about? "Why didn't you tell me you were engaged?"

I'll tell you that it really set me off. For one, I brought up "why should I have told you when you hate the man that I am with?". I don't hate him, was the response, because I haven't been able to get to know him. But you have judged him from day one because he isn't a Protestant Christian. Well, I'm no longer one either. Yet you still berate me and say that my faith is false, that it is a cult. She had little to say about that. I told her that she has expressed the idea I should divorce him and she denied it. I told her that she has been disapproving and disappointed in me for all of my life and that she needs to stop and be happy for me.

I asked her to be more open minded but she took the "woah is me" approach. I could not feel any repentance in her when we talked and I am not trying to let this hurt but I have lost my support system. They were a crappy one all of these years and they were not good enough for me, but they had been distantly "there". Just thinking about my conversations with her makes me ill. I think I might need to cut it off completely just to get emotional stability and it kinda scares me. I am willing but I am hurt.

I want to have support but I feel so lost and lonely. I don't know how I can get any real support in the near future…. I will let these words out of myself so they aren't stuck inside to fester. If even just one person reads this and feels enough empathy to lend a hand or send a good thought my way, maybe it will be worth it.

~ Gracie

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Upon Reflection

I was born on January 2, 1987. As the first born of the family and first born grandchild of my maternal grandparents, high expectations were placed on me. I was expected to have high grades, much intelligence, strong spiritual grounding, high morals, and always try to be the best in everything.

I was told during school years that receiving A grades was expected and that B grades were disappointing. Imagine how I felt when I struggled so desperately to succeed with flying colors in AP Chemistry (as one of two seniors in a class dominated by juniors) and to come out with C grades only. It was passing grades but I felt absolutely broken from it.

I was told to focus on my schoolwork to the point of being unable to focus on self realization, self consciousness, self esteem, and self development.  When boys talked with me in school, I felt they were only trying to get help with their schoolwork (especially math class and Spanish class) and had no interest in me. How could they? Their goal was to take the easy route by getting me to explain it or for me to do their work. I wouldn't be surprised if some kids cheated off of me without me catching them.

Often when I tried to do something good or enjoyable, I would be reprimanded for not being good enough (though it was more of a hobby or experiment, I was still expected to perform near perfection). I clearly remember my mother reading something I wrote in middle school and receiving her reaction of "it's okay but it needs work". I had asked her what she thought of it and she focused on the grammar in review. She didn't take interest in the story though I was just experimenting and pushed me down about technicalities. I am sure she didn't mean to be so harsh to me but it left a lasting impression - not good enough. I struggled to try to bring things to her (prior and after) and kept getting mediocre/downer responses. After a while, I decided to quit trying to get approval but a subroutine system had already founded itself in my psyche: try to win approval but expect depressing disapproval. Even with praise, I was taught to take it as fake praise (still disapproving) so I could not raise myself out of this vicious whirlpool of emotional/mental pain.

I never wanted to admit it but this really affected my psyche. How could I be good enough when those that were supposed to be there for me looked at my efforts in disdain? It wasn't just in schoolwork and writing, though. This expectation statute that they set forward was with my music (piano and flute), modesty, cooking, spiritual life, relationships, and more: be the best, be a shining example, and nothing less than best is good enough. [I am a horrible cook aside spaghetti because they never gave me good lessons in the kitchen, but I am learning how to make food now years after leaving their home and look forward to improvement.]

They expected so much of me in all aspects and I think this is a burden that many first born children receive. It hurt me more than I cared to admit because it transformed from words in my ear into a fester in my soul and self so that I had a hard time reaching out anymore. I always thought that I was never abused because abuse is physical but I just realized recently that it can be emotional and mental just like what they did to me with their responses and expectations.

Spiritually, they expected me to be a "candle on the hilltop" example for the world. I struggled so hard to be that but I kept feeling an emptiness inside of me. Something was missing but I couldn't figure out what. I called myself Christian but something kept gnawing inside. It wasn't right. I didn't feel right. If I was supposed to be the happy "born again" Christian and I had gone through the motions, how come I still felt like I was missing something?

I surrounded myself with Christian friends, listened to Christian music, read Christian books, and attended many Christian related events and groups but I still didn't feel that "everlasting peace and joy" that was supposed to be the product of such an outpouring of one's self into such activity. I thought if I rededicated myself to the path that this happiness and peace would be mine and I would find fulfillment. Alas, even after two baptisms (for which I felt really good immediately after), I felt wrong. Something was off and I couldn't figure out what. Maybe it was just me or maybe my surroundings.

Years after graduating from a Baptist faith-based university (for which I regret the amount of debt and seemingly wasted years, in hindsight, I have put into for that piece of paper I rarely use in real life), I found more meaning in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in a few months than in years in their churches. I really feel a connection to my heavenly Father and this is a good thing. Beforehand, I felt empty but now I don't. Even with becoming LDS, I still struggled to become an individual because I continued to hear the echoes of disappointment and high expectations from my family. It didn't help that they kept denying my happiness saying that the LDS church is blasphemous and an occult. How can something that enhances my life (emotionally and spiritually) be bad? And yet they continue to this day to say that it is false and that I am spiritually lost.

My self esteem issues have been a big part of my psyche. I accepted being fat and "ugly" as my burden, unable to truly accept compliments. Along with assuming and being told that boys in school had no interest in me, my family never encouraged me to try being better or feeling better about myself. I kept failing at meeting their expectations that I dropped all dreams of a better life. This manifested through neglecting my physical self as well as my emotional and mental side. I allowed myself to become obese and wear terrible clothes. How could I flaunt myself when I felt my body was not worthy?

I understand that they taught me modesty due to the fact that my maternal grandfather was a pervert that tried to sexually abuse my mother when she was younger and had wandering eyes around myself and my female cousins. Multiple times he grasped my rear and the "spider senses" told me it was wrong, so I would move out of his grasp. Because of what he did to my mother and how he reacted blossoming female teens, I could not experiment with fashion or my style. I remember one day (over 20 years old) relaxing on the couch and my shirt lifted itself slightly. I felt good but my mother, though there were no guests over, was revolted. "Cover yourself up" she shrieked and my thought was maybe any visible skin was a cardinal sin. It really hurt my emotional psyche and I have had issues, between being around my grandfather and my mother's scolding, that makes it hard to be comfortable around others when not fully covered up from nearly neck to knees.

I always felt that I was a secure individual and proud of the person I was when in reality I felt like I could never be good enough at anything, my spiritual side was empty, and I quietly hated my physical self. It has taken me thirty-two years to figure myself out, which is a long time to discover one's self. Most would have done these reflections, experiments and built their self up when they were a teenager but I was rejected this.



In the years since I graduated with my second degree (which is even less valuable to me than my first degree), I met a friend that was/is unbelievably good to me. He said that he would like me for who I was but that maybe I needed to improve myself. "Don't keep letting yourself be put down" he said when we first met. He has been a support through everything, especially during the period of time where my family judged me for becoming LDS. "If it makes you happy, go for it. You don't need to change for others. Just change to better yourself for yourself."

They have berated, belittled, judged, dehumanized, and hated him. Why? Because he isn't what they expected for me. He isn't a short haired, Protestant, college educated, rich or high-paid, quiet push-over. He is not what they expected for me and therefore have given him nothing but crap, even though I am happy with him and he is one of my best friends. I would tell them that I am permanently with him but, even after nearly eight years since he met them, they keep him at arm's length as if he is a toxic contagion that will drastically change/destroy their lives like he has "destroyed" mine. In fact, my mother has suggested (in the last year) that we divorce so that I "wouldn't have to be with someone like him". Why she would say this when she has been the cause of my agony? Maybe to keep control of her daughter, is my guess. Maybe she is trying to live a different life vicariously through me… I don't know the reason but it hurts me so terribly. I've tried to forgive them before and move past it but it always seems to come back at me - he's not good enough for you; you need someone else.



Though I received a Bachelors in Spanish and an Associates in Management Accounting, I have not used them. They (being my family, especially my grandfather in this case) disapproved and scolded me for wasting all that time and money just to not use it for work. Well, as a bus driver, yes sometimes I have had to use my Spanish to communicate with passengers (especially those visiting from other places). Even with non-English and non-Spanish speakers, I have learned to try to give the passenger a chance to speak even if it is a slower conversation because they are struggling with words. My family has given me grief for being a bus driver and my response has been simple: I like it, it pays my bills, I don't have to go for more education, and I'm fairly good at it. What more can they ask for, realistically? In my opinion, nothing. I like my job and it sustains me. Sure, it doesn't give as much as a CFO of a major company but that's too much work and too much stress for me.

One major thing they don't like about this career change [aside the fact I changed my mind, in college, against being a teacher which had been my childhood dream] is that my friend suggested trying being a commercial driver. I didn't think I could do it (driving a forty-five foot bus is intimidating, even without passengers on board!) but I was able to pass my written tests and the driving test and have been a bus driver for nearly seven years. Yes, there have been times when I have just wanted to quit being a bus driver but I keep going back to it. It pays the bills and I am decent at it. There are also days where people just make my day, make me laugh, and make me feel approved of. How awesome it is when you are on schedule and passengers say "thank goodness you're here!". Even off schedule on a fixed route, many passengers that understand bad weather and traffic will end up saying "I'm glad you came. Sure you're late but you came and I didn't miss you." I've had many passengers that have just been so wonderful, even in only brief periods or one-time rides, that my heart feels full. I do a good job at being a bus driver and my passengers (with the occasional jerk or upright unrelenting prick) like me being there, knowing that they are being taken care of.




I sit here, upon reflection of the thirty-two years so far, and realize that my life isn't what I want it to be. I am miserable because I feel like they are constantly on my shoulder with a disapproving glare and a "not good enough". I am miserable because I hate my body (especially the fat) and the fact that I have not taken care of it. I am miserable because they keep knocking down my faith. I am miserable because they keep degrading and disapproving of my marriage. I am miserable and I hate it.


I hate my name "Rebekah" because I was ingrained with the "it's the Biblical spelling" reasoning. I feel like that name is dripping with everything they expected and wished of me, and it is poisonous to me because their wishes and my choices are not in sync. As much as I have tried, I just can't be whom I want to be with all that they have wanted for me hanging around my emotional/mental self like a noose or harness. I need to change to become better for myself. I can't continue like this without being miserable. I thought, in disillusion, that getting married and changing my last name would change their minds but that hasn't happened and predictions are that that will never happen. My decision, therefore, has been to change myself drastically. If my name "Rebekah" reminds me of all of their falsehoods, mean-spirited remarks and actions, unrealistic expectations, and disappointment, why should I live with it? I will have a hard time overcoming all of this with that negative canopy over me so I will do something to improve myself. In legal stuff (taxes, bills, work, medical, etc), my name will stay "Rebekah" but I will start telling people to call me "Gracie".

In the last few years, I have created this alter persona named "Gracie Mae DeLunac" (which many on my blog and Twitter know already) which is my pen name. She doesn't have all of this backstory bullshit on her conscious so she can do what she wants. She is creative and outgoing and looking forward to new things. Since this is my pen name, I will take "Gracie" as my new nickname: "Hi, my name is Rebekah but please call me Gracie."

I came to this conclusion early morning during reflection on Monday February 18, 2019 to change. It made me feel so good inside that I almost fell asleep immediately, which is amazing because I have not been sleeping well for days thanks to a torn PCL ligament in the right knee and lumbar spine strain. I tested it at my chiropractor on the 18th and it made me feel wonderful. I haven't felt this good since I found the LDS church to be so caring and accepting and a good fit for my soul. I can change for the better. It seems a bit drastic to do this in this manner but other changes have not stuck. I need to cut my old life out of my present life so that I can enjoy my present and have a good future. I don't know what life is going to bring my way but I do feel like it will be okay. I would love to say that my Gracie persona is more resilient and stronger but that remains to be seen. This change won't change who I am at my core (passionate, caring, empathetic, curious, intelligent, creative) but will let me get past the hurt of the past and let me improve towards the better.


So, that's what I have been through and I would like to say "Nice to meet you, I am Gracie."


~ Gracie




Tuesday February 19, 2019.




Friday, February 15, 2019

Movie Review: "A Serbian Film" 09/24/10 SERBIA

This is a movie review for "A Serbian Film", released to the public in Serbia on September 24, 2010.



--------------------------------------------

WARNING! This movie is known to be THE worst movie that has ever been created, banned by 13 countries worldwide for the content. It even had issues being aired to the general public because of what it contains.

If you do not want to be scarred from this, do not watch! You might not even want to read the review because I will go into detail about how terrible this movie is.

ALSO if you are prude when it comes to talking about sex, this movie/review IS NOT for you! The main theme of this movie is all about sex {in a VERY perverted and sadistic way}.

-----------------------------------------------








Trailer








Cast

Srdjan 'Zika' Todorovic       Milos
Sergej Trifunovic               Vukmir
Jelena Gavrilovic               Marija
Slobodan Bestic                Marko
Katarina Zutic                    Lejla
Luka Mijatovic                   Stefan




Plot

Milos was a porn star known for his hard cock that could fuck and fuck for hours with all the women. He then got married to the beautiful Marija and they had a curious little sweetheart son named Stefan. Milos swore that he would stop being a porn star but bills are piling up and Marija asks how they are going to pay for everything like Stefan's singing lessons. When Milos' former coworker/co-star Lejla suggests for him to take a very profitable porn filming opportunity, he has to debate on it. Should he do it so he can finally fully retire or should he find something else to support his family?





Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.




0.5/5 - *SPOILERS* WARNING: This movie is completely depraved. How the heck did this film ever come to light from some person's mind, I don't understand.  We watched the US released NC-17 version but I still have to say this was BAD.


It is one thing to have bad porn/sex but this is a whole different level of bad. There was a scene that we didn't get to watch because it was not part of this NC-17 version. We read about it and it was absolutely depraved: the film director Vukmir showed Milos a film that he had previously made where a woman was giving birth to a child [which was in the NC-17 version]. The part right after the birth was edited for the NC-17 version but the unedited version was the man that had done the delivery went and raped the just-born baby while the mother seemed to be smiling with joy. Sorry but if I had to have seen this in the movie, I would have stopped the movie and said no more. That is BEYOND belief. WHY THE FUCK would you ever film something like this, even if it was a robot? Depravity to the extreme.

That was just the beginning of the bad. At one point, Milos was trying to get out of the whole situation (and that's when Vukmir showed him his previous film with the newborn child). Vukmir ended up spiking Milos' whiskey. It wasn't just any kind of drug - we find out later that it was an aphrodisiac for bulls. After he finally submits to the drug, Milos finds out that he lost a few days since he last was able to see the calendar. What happened the last few days? [The "find out what happened" after the fact thing actually made me interested in the movie but when we actually find out what happened, I wanted to throw up.]

Through finding some video tapes, he starts to remember and relive the last few days. One thing that happened is that he was set upon a female costar which had been casted as a whore that had abused her daughter. He was so into it that when the director Vukmir gave him a machete, he had no will to stop himself. Vukmir tells him to chop off the female porn star's head and he goes for it, but the aphrodisiac keeps him fucking the beheaded woman's body even with the blood spraying out over him.

Milos then passes out and one of Vukmir's men rapes him while he is drugged, and it is caught on tape.

To top it off, Vukmir and his men set up the "final act" for the film. The drugged Milos is taken to a set where there is a large custom-made bed. On the bed are two robed and face-covered people, both drugged that we learn about later. We cannot see any indication of who or what they are, but my stomach dropped when I saw this scene set up. Milos is set up with the first one and his bull-aphrodisiac drugged state of mind makes him just rape the person in front of him. After a little bit, Vukmir is pulled off of the first one and pushed onto the second person, whom is much smaller than the first one [which really made me ill at the idea of what/who it might be]. Another man (face-covered) is brought into the scene and is put on the first person on the bed, but Milos has no thing to say because the drugs are controlling him and making him just a sex-driven animal. It isn't until the cover is taken off the other three in the bed that Milos realizes what is going on - his brother Marko is fucking his wife Marija {that Milos had fucked first} and Milos is fucking his son Petar. In a rage, Milos kills Vukmir and Vukmir's staff while Marija kills Marko.

After finding out what happened, Milos returns home to find his traumatized wife and son locked in a room at home. They try to return to normal life but the boy is so traumatized that he is no longer curious or even eating. Milos sits there looking at a gun debating on killing himself because he was not able to protect his family and was actually one of the causes of the torment on his family. His wife comes up to him and they have a silent understanding. The three of them, Petar in the middle of their embrace, lie down in bed and use the only bullet to commit suicide/homicide together as a family. You'd think that the movie would end there but people that Vukmir had been in contact (supposedly the one who might have commissioned the film that Milos had starred in) show up and decide to desecrate their dead bodies.




Even just remembering the details of this movie for the review, I just feel sick to my stomach. It gets a rating of .5/5 or 1/10 because the amnesia and finding out what happened twist was really good. Everything else about the movie is BAD. Despicable. Outright an atrocity against humanity. I don't care if that is what Serbia is like (which would be ridiculous to think of as a country-wide state of depravity), this is not a good movie. THE top [or at least in the top 5] worst movie in the world and definitely the worst that I have EVER seen.

I will never watch this ever again. I will let it disappear into the blog for me to never touch again.  I warned you! If you really want to try experiencing this movie yourself, feel free but you might be permanently scarred and disturbed.




That's my review. CONGRATULATIONS if you have made it through this whole review. I thank you!
More reviews are to come so keep an eye out.

~ Gracie Mae DeLunac



Contact me?

Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter  https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email GracieMaeDeLunac@yahoo.com








1343

Movie Review: "Escape Plan 2" 06/29/18

This is my movie review for "Escape Plan 2: Hades" released June 29, 2018.





Trailer








Cast

Sylvester Stallone                      Ray Breslin
Dave Bautista                            Trent Derosa
Xiaoming Huang                        Shu
Wes Chatham                           Jaspar Kimbral




Plot

Ray Breslin is known as the Houdini of breaking out of maximum security prisons. He has, since the first Escape Plan movie, created a team of experts that he has taught his ways so that they could help out getting people (hostages, for example) out of sticky situations safely. One situation, that we see at the beginning of the movie, finds that one of his students is not a team player and that lets one of the hostages get shot. The hostage dies from the wound and Breslin fires him.

Later down the timeline, one of the students named Shu is taking care of his cousin (nearly brother since they were raised together by Shu's cousin's parents) for the cousin's stag party. However, the two of them are captured because Shu's cousin is high up in a technological company and could be worth millions of dollars if they can get the tech out of him. They are sent to a maximum security prison and Breslin, with his group of experts, try to figure out how to get the two of them out. Of course, Breslin says that he would rather be in the prison than outside of it and, coincidentally, someone has that idea for him too. He is captured and put into the jail where Shu and Shu's cousin are. The main question, therefore, is can they get out alive?




Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.


3/5 - This movie was okay but did not live up to the expectations of the first movie, even with Stallone back playing the part of Breslin. The movie seemed like a Tron: Legacy meets Escape Plan (1) because it was all about technology. Robots for guards, robots for medical staff, plasma force doors, etc. There was no human element aside the prisoners, which they call "animals" since the prison is a "zoo". Sure, there is the prison warden which names himself the "zookeeper" but that man is rarely ever seen. Everything is technology.

There is a fight system set up that a number of prisoners (1x1 or 1x5 or 5x40 or whatever they deem is okay) where the winners go to a sanctuary with wall displays of waterfalls and flowering meadows and wonderful things. The losers are given less food and less human rights. So everyone is wanting to win the fights because they get more rewards. Of course, it is a way to make the prisoners more animalistic which makes the jailers even more just in the name calling of the zoo and animals.

Aside the technology, this movie is pretty lame. My Mister fell asleep while watching and I, having watched all of it, feel like it was kinda a waste of time. I would not recommend this movie nor will I watch it again.


That's my movie review! Thank you for reading.
More movie reviews to come so keep an eye out for them!




~ Gracie Mae DeLunac

Contact me?

Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter  https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email GracieMaeDeLunac@yahoo.com






602

Movie Review: "Escape Plan" 10/18/13

This is a movie review for "Escape Plan", released October 18, 2013. We watched this via the Roku Channel.





Trailer





Cast

Sylvester Stallone                         Breslin
Arnold Schwarzenegger               Rottmeyer
Jim Caviezel                                 Hobbes
Faran Tahir                                   Javed




Plot

Breslin is a genius about how to break out of maximum security prisons. Over the multiple years, he has proved many prisons to be lacking and how to improve their procedures/equipment/location. One day, he gets an offer from a government lady (FBI or CIA?) saying they would like him to test this one black-bag operation prison for those that they need completely disappeared from the world without killing them. He is given the necessary information including a "get out free" code but when he tries it after the first taste of the prison, the information is invalid. He gets the message that he is there permanently. So now the question for Breslin is how does he get out of this super maximum prison facility without backup from the outside and without the "get out free" code? Will this prison defeat the Houdini of prison breaks?






Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



4/5 - This is a wonderful movie. I had a difficulty predicting what would happen to the point that I stopped trying. It is like nothing I've ever seen. I loved seeing Stallone and Schwarzenegger in action. They still have it, which was amazing to see since they have been wonderful actors (Terminator, Rambo, etc).

If you like action flicks (especially with older action actors), this is something for you to watch! If you like escape movies, this is something for you to watch! I highly recommend this movie. I knocked it down a star because I think the re-viewing rating for myself is less than "definite". [AKA I would watch this again if someone wanted to watch it with my but I probably wouldn't choose it as in the top 10 to rewatch.]




That's my review. Thanks for reading!
Many more reviews to come so keep an eye out for them!


~ Gracie Mae DeLunac

Contact me?

Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter  https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email GracieMaeDeLunac@yahoo.com






424

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Movie Review: "The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies" 12/17/14

This is a movie review for "The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies", released December 17, 2014. This is the third of the "The Hobbit" series, the first being "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" (movie review is here) and the second being "The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug" (movie review is here).


For those that read the book "The Hobbit" by J.R.R. Tolkien, I will warn you that the whole trilogy is NOT like the book. They do have the world of Middle Earth and those that made this trilogy used the musical themes they had in the Lord of the Rings trilogy but that's pretty much about it for comparison.




Trailer









Cast

Ian McKellen                       Gandalf
Martin Freeman                   Bilbo
Richard Armitage                Thorin
Hugo Weaving                     Elrond
Cate Blanchett                     Galadriel
Christopher Lee                   Saruman
Orlando Bloom                    Legolas
Evangeline Lily                    Tauriel
Luke Evans                          Bard


{AGAIN: Many more cast actors/actresses, especially since the Dwarf group consists of 12 dwarves. Thorin is the leader and therefore I mentioned the actor for him.}




Plot

The dwarf party has finally made it to the Lonely Mountain and managed to get the dragon Smaug out of it, but headed towards Lake Town. As Lake Town tries to survive the attack from the fiery winged menace, the dwarves barricade themselves in so they can protect their domain. Bard fights against the dragon in Lake Town while Legolas and Tauriel follow an orc away from the town to find that the orcs are planning to attack the Lonely Mountain. Legolas' father and their kin also come down to fight for the Elvish silver heirlooms that were taken from them years ago. Can there be peace with Thorin as the king of the mountain or will there be a *spoilers?* five army battle?





Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



3/5 - *SPOILERS* About 95% of this movie is NOT according to the book, just to clarify.

The five armies: Thorin and his little band of dwarves (and Bilbo) in the mountain, Thorin's cousin with an army, Legolas' father's army, the army of men that survived the Lake Town attack by Smaug, and the orc army.

Tauriel and her dwarf lover have their little love plot going but oh wait he's not going to survive and she's going to be completely devastated.

Thorin (the dwarf king of the Lonely Mountain) is now completely mad: he's getting selfish, forgetting his promises, becoming paranoid and not trusting even those that were in his party on the trek from Bilbo's house to the mountain (even after all the crap they had to deal with), etc. So how can he recover from this madness brought on by the dragon's gold? Well, that's where this white orc lord comes in with the vengeance crap and his army. What a poor conclusion to that story line....

At least two of the dwarves are killed by the orc army, aside Thorin - Tauriel's lover and his brother.

Bilbo survives. No surprise there because we saw him writing the story in the first installment of the trilogy but seriously how the hell does a halfling survive such a dramatic battle?

Gandalf survives. Again, no surprise.

Legolas does some "physics are nothing for elves" moves while battling, where I just wanted to find a silver bullet or some crap to take his show-off moves down. He survives but is devastated to see Tauriel in pieces over her dwarf lover's death. His father sends him to go search out Aragorn "Strider". [Again, not in the book, thank you.]

At the end, Bilbo leaves the mountain and heads back home. He finds his things being auctioned off because he had "disappeared" and feared dead. He proves he is himself with the piece of parchment that says he was working with Thorin and the company. When asked who Thorin was, Bilbo responds with a "he was my friend". End of movie..... WTF.




The best part of the movie was dealing with the dragon (which was maybe like 20 minutes at the beginning). Everything else was just crap. Over dramatized elvish moves, over dramatized romance plot, too many armies showing up JUST right after Thorin takes the mountain [I mean, how did they all know to show up then when there are no news or cell phones or whatnot?!], etc.


As the most deviated movie from the book, this movie was more of a stand-alone movie. Even as a stand-alone movie, this movie was just terrible. I am glad I didn't pay money to see this in the theater because I am extremely disappointed.


Feel free to view the movie if you wish but I personally don't recommend it. I agree with my friends saying that the "The Hobbit" trilogy is not really good, and is considered especially terrible compared to the book.  If it was a "stand alone" of the trilogy suggestion and you could understand it without the context of the other movies, I would say that the second one "Desolation of Smaug" was the best of the three but still failed to meet expectations.


That's my review so thanks for reading!
More reviews are to come so please keep an eye out for them.




~ Gracie Mae DeLunac

Contact me?

Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter  https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email GracieMaeDeLunac@yahoo.com





A CinemaSins video - "Everything Wrong With "The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies" in 18 Minutes or Less":











963

Movie Review: "The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug" 12/13/13

This is a movie review for "The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug", released December 13, 2013. This is the second movie of the "The Hobbit" trilogy. The first movie was "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey", for which my review is here.

For those that read the book "The Hobbit" by J.R.R. Tolkien, I will warn you that the whole trilogy is NOT like the book. They do have the world of Middle Earth and those that made this trilogy used the musical themes they had in the Lord of the Rings trilogy but that's pretty much about it for comparison.





Trailer








Cast

Ian McKellen                       Gandalf
Martin Freeman                   Bilbo
Richard Armitage                Thorin
Cate Blanchett                    Galadriel
Orlando Bloom                    Legolas
Evangeline Lily                    Tauriel
Luke Evans                          Bard


{AGAIN: Many more cast actors/actresses, especially since the Dwarf group consists of 12 dwarves. Thorin is the leader and therefore I mentioned the actor for him.}




Plot

Still making their way towards the Lonely Mountain to reclaim their homeland, a company of dwarves accompanied by a hobbit named Bilbo Baggins and a wizard named Gandalf come across many obstacles in the way. Can they make it to the mountain before their time runs out?






Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.


4/5 - *SPOILERS* I admit, the first time I heard that Legolas was in this set of movies, I was angry. Legolas was NEVER in the book but no, we need to pull people that were in the first made trilogy so to bring in as many interested parties as possible. Like using Orlando Bloom how many times in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies because all the gals thought he was freaking hot? Yeah, like that but as a bow-wielding elvish prince. Oh, by the way, Legolas is actually a prince, not just Gimli throwing names at him because he disliked elves. Legolas' father is a king of one of the elf lands like Elrond is of Rivendell and Galadriel is of Lothlorien. And to make matters more complicated, let's throw in a female elf that has a huge crush on Legolas and is one of the guards of the king's land, but then she turns to have a crush on one of the dwarves after they capture the company [go figure].

Plotline is fluffed up, again, with perils that the book never had but at least most of the fluff is understandable [like getting caught by Legolas' elves, having to be smuggled into the Lake Town via Bard covering them in barrels and filling the barrels full of fish, etc]. Beorn is an exception to this "understandable fluff" because WTF is this beast-man thing? No Tolkien book of this series has anything to say about people that turn into beasts.


The best thing about this movie was the dragon. I honestly was really excited to see the dragon and was rooting for the dragon to win (though obviously he wouldn't because he dies in the book, but here's to hoping! Maybe he'd take out a dwarf or two but no....).





The ending was very much a cliff-hanger so that was terrible. I know that the dragon will be killed in the next movie but I was looking forward to watching the dragon destroy as much as possible, showing the dwarves and the people of Lake Town how they should fear such a formidable force.





That's my review! Thanks for reading.
More reviews are on their way, including the next one of "The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies". Keep watch.

~ Gracie Mae DeLunac




Contact me?

Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter  https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email  GracieMaeDeLunac@yahoo.com






Here's CinemaSins' "Everything Wrong with "The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug" in About 12 Minutes":

















684

Movie Review: "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" 12/14/12

This is a movie review for "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey", released December 14, 2012.





Trailer








Cast

Ian McKellen                       Gandalf
Martin Freeman                   Bilbo
Richard Armitage                Thorin
Hugo Weaving                     Elrond
Cate Blanchett                     Galadriel
Christopher Lee                   Saruman
Andy Serkis                         Gollum


{Many more cast actors/actresses, especially since the Dwarf group consists of 12 dwarves. Thorin is the leader and therefore I mentioned the actor for him.}




Plot

Many years ago, the dwarves lived in the mountain. Then a dragon attacked, killed, burned and destroyed everything around the Lonely Mountain. Time has come to retake the mountain. Gandalf decided to stir up the life of the quiet-living Bilbo Baggins by putting a marker on the door and telling the dwarves to meet in his house, which surprises the hobbit but what can you do when you have a dozen dwarves coming in? Gandalf asks Bilbo to be the burglar of the group, to aid them in their quest to retake the mountain, and at first Bilbo says no. For some reason, he finally decides to say yes. What kind of an adventure is this little halfling going to go on? What will he have to endure to get through to the goal? Can a halfling/hobbit go there and come back again?






Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.


3.5/5 - *SPOILERS* It was good to return to the Lord of the Rings world. The beginning shows Bilbo writing the tale as he did at the beginning of the "Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring" movie, with Frodo questioning him. Of course it was nice to see that and see how it fit with the other trilogy but it was not necessary because it showed that yes, he did make it there and back. I would have rathered them just take it from the beginning of the tale, not the recollection while he is writing.

As a stand alone movie, it isn't bad. I haven't read the book [SINGULAR!] in ages but I could recognize parts that weren't part of the book - rock giants that seem to be mountains but are also deciding to have a fight while the dwarves and Bilbo are on the side of one, the incident with the goblins, going to Rivendell, the warg riders coming after them, Azog the white coming with blood-thirsty revenge against Thorin, etc. It definitely felt like fluff to me, especially the rock giants [WTF].

I liked the addition of the wizard Radagast with his rabbit chariot, though that was an addition. Radagast and the conversation of any other wizards (aside Saruman) was never mentioned in the books, so it was nice to see a nature-biased wizard in Radagast.


Radagast with his rabbits, leading the warg riders away from the dwarves:



Radagast was definitely the best addition to this movie, in my opinion, though still fluff. Aside that, the movie was kinda lame. I should have listened to my friends when they said "the movie ruined the book's story, especially taking one book and making it into three movies". Yeah, I agree with them but it is up to you if you want to watch this. The world of Middle Earth is good and goes right along with the Lord of the Rings movies, so that's good. The music is right with the Lord of the Rings movies also so that's a point for. However, there is so much added fluff that is noticeably added for fluff (running in the goblin lair like dummies just like when they did it in Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Rings before the Balrog) that it makes the movie substandard for this franchise. I hoped the next Hobbit movies were better and now I will write the reviews for those ones too.


EDIT: Oh, by the way, this is the movie where Bilbo finds the Ring and steals it away from Gollum [while also stupidly telling him where he is from, which will come back after Frodo in "The Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring"].



That's my review! Thank you for reading.
More reviews are to come, the next two being "The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug" and "The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies", so keep watching!



~ Gracie Mae DeLunac



Contact me?
Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter  https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email  GracieMaeDeLunac@yahoo.com




Also, a CinemaSins for this movie: "Everything Wrong with The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey in 4 Minutes or Less":












809

Movie Review: "The Emoji Movie" 07/28/17

This is a movie review for "The Emoji Movie" released July 28, 2017. We watched this via Netflix.





Trailer










Cast

T.J. Miller                             Gene
James Corden                     Hi-5
Anna Faris                           Jailbreak
Maya Rudolph                     Smiler
Steven Wright                      Mel Meh
Jennifer Coolidge                Mary Meh





Plot

In the world of the emoticons used in your messenger, every emoticon has their own role. If you are a poop, you're always a poop. If you're a smiler, you're always supposed to be smiling (no matter the circumstance). For the "meh" family, they are always supposed be neutral and act "meh". However, for Gene Meh, he has an issue with that because he feels many different emotions. This deviation to the norm causes the phone user to want to reset the whole phone.

How can Gene live up to being a meh? Why must he be stuck in a certain emotion? Will he ever fit in? Or can he prove that those with more than one emotion can be accepted? Above all, can he stop the user from deleting EVERYTHING on the phone?







Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



2/5 - *SPOILERS* Oh my gosh, seriously.... This is so lame. Like it is a movie advertisement for Candy Crush, Just Dance, YouTube and a few other things. Gene runs around on the background of the phone, passing through these apps, as he tries to make his way (with the egotistical Hi-5 and the strange Jailbreak) to the Dropbox so he can access the Cloud and reset his code. Smiler also sends robots to get rid of Gene because he is a threat to the norm.

Along the way to the Dropbox, he is supposed to have character development but not him nor his two companions really do. Sure, he manages to get Jailbreak to try dancing and Gene does rescue Hi-5 after he was trapped in the erasing Just Dance app [by going to the recycle bin to retrieve him], but there isn't much character development or relationship development. Oh, but he does find out that she's a Princess emoji.


The dancing is kinda cool but lame....








Mel Meh (Gene's dad) professes to his wife Mary Meh that he also has the multiple-emotions malfunction. Does this really change things? No, but gives us a bit of "this is why" Gene is odd. Mel does try to stand up for his son but is also threatened to be taken out because of his malfunction.


Anyways, Gene's odd multiple-emotion malfunction gets them beyond the Firewall because the word was the user's crush's name and could only be tried with one emotion at a time. He also saves the phone, at last second, by being scanned with a changing emotion emoticon that was sent to the user's crush. She said that was pretty cool and asked him to the dance, so he stopped the delete and life continued.  For one, a complete phone wipe can't be stopped during the process (DUH!). For two, the coincidence that they were able to send the emoticon at last second and she was able to respond IMMEDIATELY in person is so ridiculous that I just shook my head while watching and muttered WTF.


It is a cute movie but the logic behind it is flawed, even for a kid movie. The violence in the movie (while not as bad as someone slicing you up Saw style) is still pretty bad. To have Smiler smiling as she orders for the robots to destroy Gene and his family for the malfunction did some scarring on my being - it is absolutely the worst to have someone act or be joyful when they are sending something terrible your way!

Not recommended for anyone, in my opinion. Your choice, though, so don't say I didn't warn you. [Stick to something like Lilo & Stitch or The Incredibles (though the bad dude was wiping supers out) over this.]




That's my review! Thank you for reading.
More reviews are on their way so keep an eye out.

~ Gracie Mae DeLunac



Contact me?
Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email   Graciemaedelunac@yahoo.com







750

Movie Review: "Pee-Wee's Big Adventure" 08/09/85

This is a movie review for "Pee-Wee's Big Adventure", released August 9, 1985. We watched this on Netflix.





Trailer











Cast

Paul Reubens                       Pee-Wee Herman
Elizabeth Daily                      Dottie
Mark Holton                          Francis Buxton





Plot

Pee-Wee is a simplistic child-like man that lives alone. He enjoys wacky things but the thing he loves the most is his bike. It is almost "the love of his life". A neighbor bully named Francis Buxton is jealous of Pee-Wee's bike and asks to buy it from him. Pee-Wee refuses to part with it (even for trillions of dollars) and continues on his way. While he is at the bike store picking up the horn for his bike, and talking with Dottie whom seems to have a crush on him, his bike [though well secured with many feet of chain] is stolen. Where is his bike? Is Francis the culprit? Can he get his bike back? What kind of adventure must Pee-Wee go through to find his bike?





Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



1.5/5 - Okay, seriously, is this movie for stoners? Even if it is meant for kids, it doesn't seem like a kids movie. It had so many quirks that I just sat there going "WTF is this anyways". Maybe kids or people high could understand it better than myself, but that's that. I didn't enjoy this movie. I find it a waste of my time and even my Mister said that it wasn't as good as when he saw it years ago. To each their own, I suppose.



That's my review. Thanks for reading!
More reviews are to come so keep watching out for them.


~ Gracie Mae DeLunac


Contact me?
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email  graciemaedelunac@yahoo.com












357

Movie Review: "Tales From The Hood 2" 10/02/18

This is my movie review for "Tales From The Hood 2" released October 2, 2018. I watched this via Netflix.





Trailer










Cast
Keith David                              Portifoy Simms
Bill Martin Williams                  Dumass Beach




Plot

Mr. Dumass Beach has a robot with AI that needs to learn to protect America against aliens, hoodlums, murderers, rapists, etc. He has asked Mr. Portifoy Simms to come tell the robot tales that the robot can learn from - how to distinguish between the good and the bad. Of course, Mr. Simms tells some horror stories that are very weird but hey, the robot is learning! Will the robot learn what it needs to so it can do its American duty and protect the citizens?




Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.



2.5/5 - *SPOILERS* The stories inside of the movie that Mr. Simms is telling are all very strange. One has a black-face doll that comes to life, kills two people, and impregnates a girl (that was trying to steal him) with hundreds of little dolls. Another story has two women that turn out to be vampires. A third story has two guys trying to get the money out of one dude but accidentally kill him and try using a "seance" to figure out where he hid his money, but it turns against them.

The best two stories of the whole anthology was the one about respecting the sacrifices before you. If those of the past did not give sacrifices, maybe the modern day black man would be unable to vote and to marry a white woman. He had forgotten the sacrifices and was reminded, with the modern day changing when those in the past didn't sacrifice themselves, how life had changed or how the past makes the present. When his pregnant wife suddenly doesn't remember him and charges him with kidnapping and raping her, he finds himself in a very strange predicament. It is only with the sacrifices of the past (a boy refusing to let himself be dehumanized, a girl being beaten to death, etc) that the modern day's comforts and rights can be given. *SPOILERS* The modern day man gives himself up so that the modern day can be what it had been and so his unborn child could live.

The last story was also pretty good about how the robot has learned throughout the movie. Turns out that he finds Mr. Beach to be the worst of all out there, due to his lying/deceiving, profit seeking, racist, and womanizing ways. It also turns out that Mr. Simms is the devil taking Mr. Beach to hell.



In all, it was rather a waste of time. I liked the two last stories but to get through the rest was very humdrum. If you want to watch it, I warn you that the stories inside are rather odd. I wouldn't watch it again, in my opinion, but that's me.






That's my review! Please feel free to comment. Thanks for reading!
More reviews are on their way so keep a watch out for them.

~ Gracie Mae DeLunac





Contact me?

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email graciemaedelunac@yahoo.com








592

Movie Review: "Jigsaw" 10/27/17

This is a movie review for "Jigsaw", released October 27, 2017.






Trailer








Cast

Matt Passmore                           Logan Nelson
Tobin Bell                                  Jigsaw/John Kramer
Callum Keith Rennie                 Detective Halloran
Hannah Emily Anderson           Eleanor Bonneville
ClĂ© Bennett                                Detective Keith Hunt
Laura Vandervoort                     Anna
Paul Braunstein                         Ryan
Mandela Van Peebles                Mitch
Brittany Allen                           Carly






Plot

After a police car chase ends with the suspect on the roof, he stands with a trigger in his hand asking for Detective Halloran. When confronted, he says that he has to decide who will die or he will die himself. In the mess, the cops shoot off the man's hand as he is touching the trigger and someone (against Halloran's orders) shoots him in the chest. "The Game Has Begun," says the man struggling.

We then find a homicide victim hanging from a bridge in the park, his face covered in a metal bucket. When he is brought in for his autopsy, they find that there is a piece of skin cut out of his face in the shape of a jigsaw piece. "But Kramer has been dead for 10 years," they say, confounded. They find an audio recording on his body that has the voice of Kramer but they are still confused. Let's run some diagnostic tests to see if it is or if it is a copycat. Well, it is Kramer's voice but how can that be when he's already dead?

The game is between five contestants. The hanging victim with the bucket on his head was the first one dead. The other four are trying to survive but they each have their vices from the past - thieving and murdering, selling a faulty motorcycle, killing a toddler and blaming her partner, and causing a friend to die due to his drinking habits. How can they survive? Is there penance that they can do to make up for the evils they have committed? And could John Kramer have actually come back from the grave, is it a copycat, or Kramer have more help than just Doctor Gordon?






Rating Criteria

0/5 – No value whatsoever. Absolute waste of time.
1/5 – Barely worth any time.
2/5 – Pathetic but has a bit of something to hold the attention a little.
3/5 – Somewhat kept the attention but could definitely have used more.
4/5 – Good, but not awe-strikingly amazing. Could have maybe used a bit more to the movie.
5/5 – Go see it! Wonderful movie all around. – characters, music, theme, story line, etc.




3/5 - I was really excited to see the newest Saw movie but this one left me feeling jipped. The devices were interesting but the plotline was really twisted. *SPOILERS* Replay what has happened in the past with Kramer's devices? WTF?! Why can't you let the dead man rest in peace? You had to go "dig him up" to make another Halloween movie for the franchise?

I find this movie to be the most disappointing of the Saw franchise movies, and that's something because I didn't really like Saw VI and Saw VII because Hoffman was just out for blood and didn't really give his victims chances to actually win (or to pay penance). The best part of Saw VII was Doctor Gordon coming back and getting him.
However, with this movie, even with the game being set up by Kramer in the past, the movie just didn't feel very thrilling. It didn't live up to the standards of Saw I, Saw II, and Saw III. Of course, what is to be expected from a franchise that is making its eighth installment?

For horror, the film delivered in its own ways but it just wasn't as catching as say Saw II. The plot wasn't as elaborate as any of the earlier films (pre Hoffman). It was more of a "is he back? I don't know. Let's do some mystery work" than the film plotline being mysterious and covered. I would have rathered keep out the detective work of "what the eff is going on?" but I guess that some people would like it.



Anyways, even though this is a Saw franchise film, I would not add it to my collection (personally). If you want to watch it, feel free but I warned you.



That's my review! Thanks for reading. Many more reviews are to come so keep an eye out.


~ Gracie Mae DeLunac









Contact me?

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/GracieMaeDeLunac/
Twitter https://twitter.com/Gracie_DeLunac
Email graciemaedelunac@yahoo.com













739